Skip to content

Financial Statement Suite

Hello there,

We are constantly looking for ways to improve Datasnipper, and we believe that the best way to do this is by listening to our users. We would love to hear your ideas and suggestions for how we can make the product even better.

Whether you have a feature request or a general suggestion, we want to hear it all. Your feedback is valuable to us, and it will help us prioritize our roadmap and make sure that we are building the right things for our users.

If you want to report a bug, please use this link https://knowledge.datasnipper.com/kb-tickets/new to reach out to our support team. They will be able to help you troubleshoot the issue and ensure that it gets resolved quickly.

Financial Statement Suite

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

7 results found

  1. From delivery perspective, mathematical accuracy check is not performed for Prior year figures however DS5 also adds stamps for PY numbers automatically which is to be individually removed in post extraction stage. This will lead to an impact on overall efficiency as increased time will be taken to remove the additional stamps.

    17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Distinguish note numbers and amounts in Japanese financial statements.
    (This request is regarding feedback URL, https://feedback.datasnipper.com/forums/952747-financial-statement-suite/suggestions/47159251-recognize-special-characters)

    In Japanese financial statements, amounts come with note number, e.g. ※1-9 (note number) 123456789 (amounts).
    After Ver6.1 DataSnipper recognize ※ as symbol to describe note number.
    At the same time note number is recognized as part of financial number.
    e.g. When revenue is described as “※1 123456789” DataSnipper recognizes the text as 1123456789.

    Users are not able to fix this by FSS calculator and this occurs very frequently.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Mathematical Accuracy  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When we run the financial statement suite, we get a whole bunch of “false errors” related to our Budget and Actual schedules. These are time consuming to clear out the error for our documentation purposes and I just wish I could train the system to recognize this schedule and know how it is supposed to foot.

    For example, the permits revenue line item had a final budget of 100,000 and an actual of 143,137. Because this is revenue, we are showing a favorable variance of 43,137. This is the correct answer. However, Data Snipper wants to add the Actual and…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Sometimes it is necessary to take two sums and find the difference between them. For example, (Assets + Deferred Outflows) - (Liabilities + Deferred Inflows) = Net Position. Currently, this is only possible by summing all amounts and changing the signs on those technically being subtracted. I would like to be able to sum each set of numbers and copy the total amounts into the subtraction function or to use multiple calculator functions within one calculation.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Mathematical Accuracy  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Problem: Users often need to edit numbers within the FS once issues or errors are detected, currently that requires them to import and export the document which is time consuming.

    Proposed Solution: Have the option to update the values directly within the FSS and mabye have it suggested based on the value within the calculator.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Within the calculator in V6 FSS, I want to be able to use the calculator to sum up numbers and then apply a tickmark based on that summation, so that when I hand off to my reviewer, the workbook has tickmarks that are indicative of the due diligence performed by me, the preparer.

    For example, in tables with amounts in columns A - E, where E contains the total, FSS may incorrectly identify a column C as a summation of A+B, and suggest incorrect TMs all the way down that column. I would want (1) to remove the suggestions from…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Currently, no casting is performed on 'large' differences. It would be good to have these flagged to show DS considered them but the difference was over a certain threshold, or allow the user to set the threshold (including no limit).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?