87 results found
-
Stamps added to both CY and PY numbers
From delivery perspective, mathematical accuracy check is not performed for Prior year figures however DS5 also adds stamps for PY numbers automatically which is to be individually removed in post extraction stage. This will lead to an impact on overall efficiency as increased time will be taken to remove the additional stamps.
17 votes -
Editable Stamps Post Extraction
The stamps in the PDF post extraction should be editable, currently it get embedded in the PDF which makes it very difficult to move the stamp post extraction of the file, so it’ll be great if the stamps are editable.
16 votes -
Highlights and Stamps in the PDF itself
Currently, the version comparison functionality makes the highlights and show the snippings in the Excel file, it is great if it highlights the data and add a comment in the PDF itself as it is helpful in documentation
16 votes -
Summary of Findings in an Excel Format
In case of findings the tool should provide the summary of findings in an excel format rather than as a part of the PDF Extracted from the FS Suite as it’ll be more helpful if it is provided in a excel format.
16 votes -
In case of PY findings, the tool should show the corresponding figures in PY FS with which the figure in Current year FS has been compared a
1)In case of PY findings the tool is not showing the corresponding figures in PY FS with which the figure in Current year FS has been compared and shown as finding. This could be done in previous manual version.
2)Also the inefficiencies have increased while performing PY check in current version.14 votes -
Identification of note numbers and financial information
Distinguish note numbers and amounts in Japanese financial statements.
(This request is regarding feedback URL, https://feedback.datasnipper.com/forums/952747-financial-statement-suite/suggestions/47159251-recognize-special-characters)In Japanese financial statements, amounts come with note number, e.g. ※1-9 (note number) 123456789 (amounts).
After Ver6.1 DataSnipper recognize ※ as symbol to describe note number.
At the same time note number is recognized as part of financial number.
e.g. When revenue is described as “※1 123456789” DataSnipper recognizes the text as 1123456789.Users are not able to fix this by FSS calculator and this occurs very frequently.
3 votes -
Run OCR only on one of the imported documents
Offer the option to choose weather to run OCR on all or just particular documents when importing docs to a tick and tie project.
5 votes -
Make custom tickmarks more custom
Custom tickmarks has a character limit. It'd be great if this limit was removed or made longer so that we can use workpaper codes, which are usually 4 or more characters long.
20 votes -
If possible, show the two compared documents side by side, after export
Allow the highlighted documents to appear side by side so that differences can be reviewed more easily. We are currently doing this with snips via the Microsoft snipping tool.
10 votes -
Teach the system how to foot a specific financial statement that is repetitive in the annual report.
When we run the financial statement suite, we get a whole bunch of “false errors” related to our Budget and Actual schedules. These are time consuming to clear out the error for our documentation purposes and I just wish I could train the system to recognize this schedule and know how it is supposed to foot.
For example, the permits revenue line item had a final budget of 100,000 and an actual of 143,137. Because this is revenue, we are showing a favorable variance of 43,137. This is the correct answer. However, Data Snipper wants to add the Actual and…
2 votes -
Version Compare Preview (Dual Page Scrolling)
Currently, Version Compare allows you to see a side-by-side view of the differences between documents only in the preview page.
Once the differences are extracted into the Excel workbook, there's no way to go back to the side-by-side view.
It would be great if we could always go back to the side-by-side view for easy visual comparison.
7 votes -
Save Total Amounts in Calculator for Further Calculations
Sometimes it is necessary to take two sums and find the difference between them. For example, (Assets + Deferred Outflows) - (Liabilities + Deferred Inflows) = Net Position. Currently, this is only possible by summing all amounts and changing the signs on those technically being subtracted. I would like to be able to sum each set of numbers and copy the total amounts into the subtraction function or to use multiple calculator functions within one calculation.
1 vote -
EXPORT
When clicking on export, there are two options: either export with all tickmarks and findings or export only the findings.
When choosing the second option, not all the comments we made on the report (by right-clicking) are included.
Often, we have comments for the company regarding the design of the report or the text, so it is important that they receive these as well.
I suggest adding an option to specify whether the comment is an exception or just for internal documentation.1 vote -
Recognize Different Formats of Note Number (ie. B1-1) for FSS IC checks
The note numbers are driven by how Government Treasury (sets the financial reporting requirements for our state entities) has set up their example statements. Sometimes the note numbers are formatted this way (B1-1, B1-2, B1-3, etc) and currently when doing IC test, it does not provide any suggestions. It would be helpful if DataSnipper algorithm can detect these note numbers for IC checks and provide suggestions.
2 votes -
The tool should allow user to provide IC wherever necessary, without restricting ICs for numbers alone.
Tool to place ICs on repeated information such as company name, year end date, directors' name etc. If a user selects an information and place IC stamp once, then the tool needs to automatically apply ICs throughout the document wherever it is repeating.
23 votes -
Auto populated comments aren't deleted if the red tickmark changed to blue tickmark
Comment regarding IC red to blue where the comment must be manually removed regarding “internal inconsistency noted”. It would be nice if it could be automatically deleted if the tickmark color changed to blue.
2 votes -
Internal Consistency reading of FN numbers
Could internal consistency read Footnote numbers if they are aligned with the Financial Statement Captions on the face of the FS? In the current state, it has to be in a separate column to activate the automation.
7 votes -
marco.de.kruijk@bdo.nl
When automatic suggestion for internal consitency are not given (which is the case in 99%) a user should manually do the ticking. In FSS in DS version 6 the user first needs to click on the number, then on the reference and then on the tickmark. This is one click more than in version 5.
It would be better if a user could click on the number in the balance sheet and P&L and immediatly can click on the reference and makes the tickmark. And the tickmarking is done automaticaly when there is only one reference.
2 votes -
IC Tickmark Hyperlinks in Exported PDF
It would be helpful if reviewers were able to click on a hyperlinked IC tickmark in an exported PDF and have it take them to the other page(s) the value is tied out instead of manually having to search for the tie outs.
4 votes -
Allow for custom tickmarcks to be automatically applied.
After creating a cutom tickmark, it is not possible to make it the default tickmark for every new tickamrk applied. You would have to select each and every one of the new tickmarks (one by one) and change it to the custom tickmark created.
6 votes
- Don't see your idea?