Skip to content

Core

Hello there,

We are constantly looking for ways to improve Datasnipper, and we believe that the best way to do this is by listening to our users. We would love to hear your ideas and suggestions for how we can make the product even better.

Whether you have a feature request or a general suggestion, we want to hear it all. Your feedback is valuable to us, and it will help us prioritize our roadmap and make sure that we are building the right things for our users.
If you want to report a bug, please use this link https://knowledge.datasnipper.com/kb-tickets/new to reach out to our support team. They will be able to help you troubleshoot the issue and ensure that it gets resolved quickly.

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

8 results found

  1. Amend the DM algorithm to prioritize matches based on a logical understanding of the documents as opposed to simply limiting the distance between snips. i.e. DM should know to extract the value from the numbers in the document, not at the end of the tax identification number.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Deferred  ·  0 comments  ·  Document Matching  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. It would be helpful if you could enter which exchange rate Datasnipper should use and then convert and match the values yourself. For example, we receive reporting packages in foreign currencies and the exchange rates used in each case. If you want to check the conversion, you have to do this manually. Datasnipper could automate this.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This has been deferred (not planned for the next 6 months).


    Please continue to share this idea, we will continue to monitor for votes and comments!

  3. Enhancing the ability within Document Matching step 3 to limit the amount threshold in a certain direction. For example in Step 3, I would like to add an Amount threshold for an input of GL Date Recorded to look for values after +3 days of input date. This would be helpful in SURL and AP testing in TODs.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This has been deferred (not planned for the next 6 months).


    Please continue to share this idea, we will continue to monitor for votes and comments!

  4. Add possibility to change the order of output columns in the 3rd step of the document matching set-up

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This has been deferred (not planned for the next 6 months).


    Please continue to share this idea, we will continue to monitor for votes and comments!

  5. Would like an option in the settings menu which can allow me to ignore or keep leading 0's currently this prevents users from being able to fully rely on datasnipper in the cases where they have a specific format of number.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This has been deferred (not planned for the next 6 months).


    Please continue to share this idea, we will continue to monitor for votes and comments!

  6. Case-sensitivity for Document Matching. ie - searching for a word in all capitals to find a specific phrase/word in a contract

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This has been deferred (not planned for the next 6 months).


    Please continue to share this idea, we will continue to monitor for votes and comments!

  7. Accuracy of the Document Matching is not always satisfactory. If a bank statement has a figure which is appearing as both negative and positive (e.g: -10000 and 10000), the software sometimes picks up negative figure when we are vouching the positive figure and vice versa.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. DM: pulling the text from the input column rather than the imported document

    Getting some very confusing results with Document Matching in v5.0.7 - The resulting snips appear to be pulling the text from the input column rather than the imported document and are matching to very partial items in the document (fuzzy matching not enabled)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?