Skip to content

Financial Statement Suite

Hello there,

We are constantly looking for ways to improve Datasnipper, and we believe that the best way to do this is by listening to our users. We would love to hear your ideas and suggestions for how we can make the product even better.

Whether you have a feature request or a general suggestion, we want to hear it all. Your feedback is valuable to us, and it will help us prioritize our roadmap and make sure that we are building the right things for our users.

If you want to report a bug, please use this link https://knowledge.datasnipper.com/kb-tickets/new to reach out to our support team. They will be able to help you troubleshoot the issue and ensure that it gets resolved quickly.

Financial Statement Suite

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

100 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  New Feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Multiple preparers to share and split the work at the same time which helps to work on bigger files with short turn around time

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  3 comments  ·  New Feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Eg: Error comment mentioned by the tool - "Inconsistent with prior year"
    Enhancement required - Tool to specify exact value in the error comment

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Eg - Reviewers can update any changes on the output file manually once stamps are movable

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Deferred  ·  0 comments  ·  Export  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Tool to place ICs on repeated information such as company name, year end date, directors' name etc. If a user selects an information and place IC stamp once, then the tool needs to automatically apply ICs throughout the document wherever it is repeating.

    24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Switching to a Word document format for the reviewed Financial statements would streamline the process of addressing any inaccuracies or inconsistencies detected.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Export  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. We would like the ability to add a comment box (similar to a sticky note in Adobe OR similar to the core platform where you can draw a box and add comments) to make viewing of comments easily identifiable for reviewing process; additionally, we would like the ability to export only comments.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  Comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. The custom tickmarks should be placed more easily, instead of going to the Custom Tickmark section, I should be able to select it and place it with left click as many times as I want. Also, it would be nice to be able to place custom tickmarks over words.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started Work  ·  0 comments  ·  New Feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Currently, no casting is performed on 'large' differences. It would be good to have these flagged to show DS considered them but the difference was over a certain threshold, or allow the user to set the threshold (including no limit).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. For tables in notes such as fixed assets, it would be useful to check the PY closings to the current year openings. In the examples of fixed assets, this would include cost, accumulated depreciation and NBV.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Request regarding the ability to remove all tickmarks (in bulk), similar to the way you can apply all tickmarks to a page or document. For example, from the 2nd draft of the financials I don’t want to see all the PY and IC tickmarks as it has been checked and shouldn’t change from that point on (which is where the version checker helps!). For the time being I have been going through and manually removing all the tickmarks but a simple remove all button would be amazing.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  0 comments  ·  New Feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. I'd like to propose the inclusion of a feature that allows users to filter out updates made to the header and footer sections when performing a version comparison.

    For instance, consider a scenario where a document's footer displays its version, such as "V1" or "V2." When comparing two documents, if the updated document contains modifications in both the main body of the document and a version change in the footer from "V1" to "V2," the version comparison currently detects and highlights all footer changes. It would be highly beneficial if we could introduce a feature that isolates alterations in the…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Version Compare  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. It would be great if the FSS Module adapted to changes in format between PY and CY financial statements (such as tables and column headings).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. It would be great if the FSS Module recognised “NIL” as a value of 0, in PY & CY figures, and successfully matched this from the financial statements to the front-end reports*, notes, and specific note references.

    *for example, Strategic Report (part of group and some single accounts) and Directors Report (on all accounts)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Deferred  ·  1 comment  ·  New Feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. It would be great if the FSS module matched all figures from the financial statements to the front-end reports*, the notes, and specific note references.

    *for example, Strategic Report (part of group and some single accounts) and Directors Report (on all accounts)

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Same as selecting all the tickmarks and then changing them all to incorrect/correct/rotate ; can you add the possibility to bulk edit the comments in the tickmarks?

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  Comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Hotkeys should be incorporated into the FSS so that the the user is less reliant on the mouse (i.e. hotkey for opening the calculator).

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  3 comments  ·  New Feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Include face-to-face referencing was done (e.g. BS to SCE equity items).

    If the BS agrees to the notes, the BS should note the note number while the note should include a reference to the BS.
    If the IS agrees to the notes, the IS should note the note number while the note should include a reference to the IS.

    That way, when reviewing the notes, you can easily see that the number agrees internally to the BS, IS, SOCIE etc. as applicable and can easily identify if it has a missing link that you would have expected.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Currently numbers within text are not tested (for all 3 procedures).
    In addition, consistency of disclosure year on year is not tested.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?