83 results found
-
Run OCR only on one of the imported documents
Offer the option to choose weather to run OCR on all or just particular documents when importing docs to a tick and tie project.
5 votes -
Recognize Different Formats of Note Number (ie. B1-1) for FSS IC checks
The note numbers are driven by how Government Treasury (sets the financial reporting requirements for our state entities) has set up their example statements. Sometimes the note numbers are formatted this way (B1-1, B1-2, B1-3, etc) and currently when doing IC test, it does not provide any suggestions. It would be helpful if DataSnipper algorithm can detect these note numbers for IC checks and provide suggestions.
1 vote -
Internal consistency check
Using the internal consistency (IC) check, it’s the same onerous clicking problem as the PY consistency tool. You have to click on the reference that matches and then you have to click on the blue or red IC. Again, it would be helpful if it just automatically added the blue PY as a default.
1 vote -
FSS - Selecting PY numbers
In some cases the tool is not picking up all the PY numbers in the PY check and then I need to manually add the PY’s. When you have to manually click each item twice (click the number and then click which PY (red or blue) and then click elsewhere in the doc to close the box the pops up, it’s very time consuming. I’m wondering if there’s a way to: a) highlight a series of numbers in a row to apply the tickmark to all at the same time AND b) to automatically have it add the blue PY…
1 vote -
Auto populated comments aren't deleted if the red tickmark changed to blue tickmark
Comment regarding IC red to blue where the comment must be manually removed regarding “internal inconsistency noted”. It would be nice if it could be automatically deleted if the tickmark color changed to blue.
2 votes -
marco.de.kruijk@bdo.nl
When automatic suggestion for internal consitency are not given (which is the case in 99%) a user should manually do the ticking. In FSS in DS version 6 the user first needs to click on the number, then on the reference and then on the tickmark. This is one click more than in version 5.
It would be better if a user could click on the number in the balance sheet and P&L and immediatly can click on the reference and makes the tickmark. And the tickmarking is done automaticaly when there is only one reference.
2 votes -
In case of PY findings, the tool should show the corresponding figures in PY FS with which the figure in Current year FS has been compared a
1)In case of PY findings the tool is not showing the corresponding figures in PY FS with which the figure in Current year FS has been compared and shown as finding. This could be done in previous manual version.
2)Also the inefficiencies have increased while performing PY check in current version.14 votes -
Stamps added to both CY and PY numbers
From delivery perspective, mathematical accuracy check is not performed for Prior year figures however DS5 also adds stamps for PY numbers automatically which is to be individually removed in post extraction stage. This will lead to an impact on overall efficiency as increased time will be taken to remove the additional stamps.
17 votes -
Highlights and Stamps in the PDF itself
Currently, the version comparison functionality makes the highlights and show the snippings in the Excel file, it is great if it highlights the data and add a comment in the PDF itself as it is helpful in documentation
16 votes -
Editable Stamps Post Extraction
The stamps in the PDF post extraction should be editable, currently it get embedded in the PDF which makes it very difficult to move the stamp post extraction of the file, so it’ll be great if the stamps are editable.
16 votes -
Summary of Findings in an Excel Format
In case of findings the tool should provide the summary of findings in an excel format rather than as a part of the PDF Extracted from the FS Suite as it’ll be more helpful if it is provided in a excel format.
15 votes -
Select Ranges for PY checking
Often datasnipper does not recognize the right PY range in the current and prior year financial statement. The user should have the ability to select a range for each page in the prior year financial statement and current year financial statement which will be compared and ticked to each other. Optionally it would be cool if datasnipper would learn those ranges and tries to apply it to other pages as for large umbrella funds it would safe a lot of time.
1 vote -
Setting up an undo button
It has happened to me several times that I have accidentally clicked on "Remove Suggestion", although I actually only wanted to change or remove a tick mark. I have not yet found a way to restore a suggestion other than by completely reinstalling it. An undo button would be helpful here, or the implementation of a keyboard shortcut such as Ctrl+Z. Ultimately, this applies to all entries in the tool, not just the suggestions.
2 votes -
Financial Statement: Trend Analysis
DataSnipper to provide a trend analysis of financial statements. The goal is to calculate and analyze the changes in amounts in the form of values and percentages.
1 vote -
Align version comparison in and out of FSS
The version comparison tool changes when a new document is presented depending on if we are using standard version compare or version compare within FSS.
1 vote -
Edit Numbers within the FSS
Problem: Users often need to edit numbers within the FS once issues or errors are detected, currently that requires them to import and export the document which is time consuming.
Proposed Solution: Have the option to update the values directly within the FSS and mabye have it suggested based on the value within the calculator.
2 votes -
Financial Statement Suite: Version Compare for Numbers AND Text
It would be great if the version compare feature in FSS had the ability to compare text changes in addition to number changes.
It would improve the quality of life for the end-user as they would no longer need to exit FSS to see a text comparison of 2 documents.
1 vote -
Version Compare Preview (Dual Page Scrolling)
Currently, Version Compare allows you to see a side-by-side view of the differences between documents only in the preview page.
Once the differences are extracted into the Excel workbook, there's no way to go back to the side-by-side view.
It would be great if we could always go back to the side-by-side view for easy visual comparison.
5 votes -
Password protection
V6
I have mentioned this to my account manager but we need to have some form of password protection on Version 6 FSS projects.
We audit firms which hit different criteria and need to lock down audit files. The FSS component being changed now will make it hard to control as its not longer associated to the workbook (which was in a locked audit file).
We wont be using v6 until something like this is enabled unfortunately.
2 votes -
If possible, show the two compared documents side by side, after export
Allow the highlighted documents to appear side by side so that differences can be reviewed more easily. We are currently doing this with snips via the Microsoft snipping tool.
10 votes
- Don't see your idea?