Settings and activity
23 results found
-
6 votesMax Schmolke shared this idea ·
-
5 votesMax Schmolke shared this idea ·
-
10 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Are you able to share some examples of documents where a repeating structured document would have dynamic length tables so that we can investigate the most ideal solution.
Max Schmolke supported this idea · -
17 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
2 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
5 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
When repeating table snips, the column preservations makes sense and should be in place already.
How would you suggest addressing row edit preservation? Preserving table 1's row edit assumes that each row height will be consistent for repeating tables. Is this the case that you are hoping to solve?
If rows are dynamic in height, row preservation unfortunatley would not resolve the core issue.
Do you have a different view on how this should work.
Max Schmolke supported this idea · -
2 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
2 votesMax Schmolke shared this idea ·
-
25 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
39 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
7 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
26 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
22 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
33 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
7 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
1 voteMax Schmolke shared this idea ·
-
14 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
-
33 votesMax Schmolke supported this idea ·
Add Incoterms to Invoice Extractions